Figure Drawing Fundamentals: a progress report

December 16, 2014

proko gesture




proko robo bean



proko structure

proko mannequinization










Photocopy paper, graphite pencil HB and 4B. Individual pages showing Gesture, Robo Bean, Structure and Mannequinization, drawn along with the Proko videoclips.

Figure Drawing Fundamentals

In recent weeks, I’ve done an initial viewing of the videoclips Parts 1-12 to get a general idea of Stan’s approach. Drawing along with the videos (more at less at speed, though sometimes with judicious use of the pause button!) has yielded more than fifty pages of sketches.

At life drawing sessions, I’m often working in very cramped conditions so I’ll use A4 photocopy paper for gestures, moving as soon as I can to A2. This use of A4 is frowned upon at art school but I try and compensate by always using an overhand grip. Where I can, I’ll do multiple gestures on a single sheet of A2 cartridge. Overlapping poses is a good compositional exercise, but I like to keep a blank area for gestures.

I’m particularly impressed by the images of the models in Proko, free of shadows and the need to “invent” stuff you can’t see.

I’m also particularly impressed with seeing exactly what can be put to paper in the timeframes available (30secs to 2mins and beyond) and how so much can be achieved with such economy of line. New Masters Academy is similarly enlightening, though their images of the sitter are much smaller.

Particularly illuminating have been the Critique sessions which reveal an enormous gulf between work covered in the videoclips and the underlying expectations of what constitutes mastery of the approach taken. The videoclips reveal what Proko sees; the Critique sessions reveal what Proko and Vandruff want to see.

I’m finding gesture a lot harder to get my head around than those aspects which build on gesture, as explained in the robo bean, structure and mannequinization videoclips. Work on the robo bean and structure tend to more easily inform understanding of gesture than the other way round. I got a lot out of Steve Huston’s insistence (over at New Masters Academy) that all art – visual, dance, music, literature – is based on Gesture and Structure.

I find I put pencil to paper a lot quicker than Stan. Stan stops and thinks before he makes a mark. I search for the form on the paper instead of in my head. Personally I tend towards the Vilppu/Huston style of “finding” the line and lots of pentimenti on the page, Giacometti-like; Proko visibly “thinks” before putting pencil to paper which means he’s spending more time looking at the model than scratching away on the paper. I can hear Stan’s voice in my head: “No more than five or ten lines!”


I feel a natural pause at the end of Proko’s Part 12 for two main reasons: (1) Part 13 and beyond really require an upgrade in drawing materials, and (2) we’re talking about a Finished Drawing approach with a single long pose. At the moment, I’m less interested in producing extended finished drawings and more interested in competent sketching at life drawing sessions, dominated by very short poses (20mins maximum).

I’d like to consolidate the Proko/Vandruff approach by not just re-watching Parts 1-12 but extending the ideas to include other formats:

  • practise using my own reference photos (especially those which are full-length poses and in optimum lighting conditions);
  • practise using Old/Modern Master drawings (especially where they are incomplete and need to be extended to include the full figure from imagination);
  • drawing entirely from imagination;
  • drawing from an Action Figure;
  • drawing from public sculptures;
  • reinterpreting own figure drawings from the past;
  • reinterpreting own life drawings from the past.

This will prove to myself that I’ve learned something from Parts 1-12 and I can critique my own work by measuring it against the comments in the Critique videoclips.


There’s a certain amount of overlap going on at the moment. I’m working through Proko’s Anatomy of the Human Body for Artists and (largely through guesswork) adding anatomy to the poses in the Figure Drawing Fundamentals course. The Anatomy course has the advantage of being in real time so I can digest new ideas for a whole week, whereas Figure Drawing is a course from the past and feels much more self-paced. Also I’ve been consulting my copy of Riven Phoenix’ Structure of Man, but of course his work is more “static” than that of Proko. I’m aware of this dichotomy of static and action especially since animation schools in America insist in their entrance portfolios on examples of each, not that I’m intending to apply to enter an American animation school. I’m watching the Vilppu and Huston figure drawing videos over at New Masters Academy and in lieu of Proko’s images, I’m using the NMA Image Library. Proko’s images have little “interference” from dark shadow, whereas NMA’s revels in shadows – large shadow masses being a signature feature of Steve Huston’s work, for example.


Why am I doing this all now? Well, I’m in the middle of a summer break and the academic year starts up again in two months. And in first semester, I have to do a course entitled Working with the Human Form.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: