The main street of Cronulla NSW long ago changed into a mall but is still redolent of cars and trucks from my childhood memories. Sitting here, I get flashbacks of how things used to be.

Other sketchers in today’s group concentrated on a clocktower in the middle of the mall, flanked by white stall marquees, creating a strong single-point perspective design. As an alternative, I checked out the relatively few architectural monuments along this narrow street; getting an interesting vantage point was not easy, the oldest buldings having been repurposed and having lost a lot of their glorious past as free-standing buildings.

I chose less obvious subject matter, a “side view” of the mall, with no central focus. There is a lot of “mess”, a lot of people and a lot of noise. Not exactly sure of what I would find – if indeed I would “find” anything – I did my usual thing and started with a hard H pencil to create some sort of framework. This dragged out for forty minutes with nothing coming to the surface. At one point, an inquisitive stranger stopped to ask me if I had my vanishing point and orthogonal lines in place.

I got talking with two other sketchers at this point and we discussed things like tone and direction lines and pentimenti. Pentimenti was raised in the context of pace: slow sketching focussing on realistic, naturalistic representation or looser, more expressionistic sketching to portray mood and emotion. We talked also about developing a signature style, one that is subsconciously unique to us and immediately recognisable to others.

We had a go at quick continuous line drawing, a chance for me to play with quill feather and ink, fineliner and yellow highlighter. The idea behind this is to familiarise ourselves with a wide range of the object’s qualities before we settle on one aspect or one feature. Ordinarily eight three-minute sketches of an object in different positions is a useful way to spend half an hour.

This resulted in we three sketching for ten minutes the same subject: a tonal sketch of two other sketchers in the distance and another of a bright white umbrella.

My drawing of the people was small, almost sight-size, with an emphasis on tone and shapes.

We discussed approaching a sketch of the umbrella, I positing that the architecture of the umbrella was primary (focussing on the pole!). Because the horizontal triangle was so difficult in its own right, my sketch concentrated on creating the white as a negative space: I worked on the spatial geometry of the windows and background to create the white for me.



Mitsubishi H and 4B pencil on A2 cartridge paper 110gsm

Another sunny morning with strong cast shadows, so an opportunity to good to pass up to go back to The Rocks in Sydney where I drew this view earlier this week. Today, instead of drawing ‘freehand’ without any careful or comparative measurement as I progressed, I aimed today for a more ‘correct’ drawing, for careful representation of the ‘boxes’ in the environment and an acknowledgement of shadows.

The focus of the sketch is the Sirius building, an example of Brutalist architecture, examples of which in Sydney are being disguised and their strong features softened these days, or, in the case of Sirius, likely to be demolished and sold off for luxury apartments. I’ve consciously included windows in the Sirius because it is the last large building in the area to house residents, the other buildings being offices, hotels and in the case of lower left, the Museum of Contemporary Art annexe. Drawing is a political act and this was an ideal opportunity to provide commentary on the rapacious actions of the super-rich in Sydney destroying the lives of the poor. That community housing will be better off by the building being sold is of course fallacious and specious: the ends don’t justify the means of dislocating the lives of the most of the vulnerable in the community.

I will leave the inclusion of ocean liners to another day; to draw them exactly would create a sketch which will be too lop-sided to read as realistic.

I took photos of the various ferries coming and going from Circular Quay below and they will make interesting studies in gouache for a later date.



Mascot panorama, 8″ square, Venezia Sketchbook Fabriano Accademia 200gsm; Sakura micron 0.5mm fineliner; Polychromos oil-based coloured pencils.


Over the years, I’ve been threatened while out location drawing at building sites into discontinuing a sketch by security guards and building/construction personnel, despite always working on public property. The law is on my side, but it’s not worth sketching under the bullying gaze and verbal interrogation of others.

The Westconnex expressway development has seen public protests since its inception so, along with the oppressively hot and humid weather today, I wasn’t going to mix it with the construction workers. Even taking a couple of reference photos for potential drawings was done as unobtrusively as possible.

I was surprised to accidentally come across this panorama of the burgeoning apartment blocks around the new metro station of Mascot in the distance. I remember when Mascot property was light industrial, with the smell of horse knackery by night. Nowadays haute couture boutique shops and luxury car showrooms have taken their place.

Apart from exploiting natural direction lines, this is a routinely-challenging square format. Making it into a rectangle would eliminate the white road markings as well as the dramatic sky. And yes, I realise it’s a cliche-looking Jeffrey Smart composition. I need to spend more time ‘skying’, as John Constable called it – drawing skies and clouds.

Use of coloured pencil with waterproof pen (as championed by James Richards, for example) is a natural extension on my pen-alone work yesterday. I love the way that in Richards’ drawings, the coloured pencil calms the overly-strong black-and-white penwork and how his very sketchy use of pencil, rather than block areas of colour, works like tinting an engraving.






Sakura Micron 0.5mm fineliner on A2 cartridge

The Rocks, Sydney

Working alla prima with no pencil underlay and with no forethought about geometrical foundation, I worked from right to left initially in contour, then in a combination of tone and cross-hatching. The line wasn’t as fluid or loose as I’d anticipated and I’m re-learning a lot about the subtlety of cross-hatching. I’m surprised how little my penwork has changed over the last five years: the ‘signature’ is firmly in place.

Happily, I worked under shelter and with a ‘found’ easel and in a setting almost devoid of distractions. High up on the viewing platform on the Cahill Expressway overlooking Circular Quay, I had barely a handful of visitors – best of all was not having to hold or handle the paper while working. Sydney Sketch Club worked this venue recently and visited the doomed Sirius building (left) from the Brutalist era. Not conveyed here with any deftness are the striking contrasts in architecture: from the Australia Navigation Company building far right, to the modernist hotel centre and the new Museum of Contemporary Art annexe left. The shadows got more defined in the last hour of the drawing, 10.30-11.30am, though their geometrical shapes were more interesting in the half-hour before that. I liked adding the indigenous flag far left.

I hope to return to this location soon.




Pen on paper – Faber-Castell PITT artist pen Black #199 F; MontMarte sketching journal 5.5×8.5″.

Summer holidays means playing with materials. This cross-hatching pen style reminds me of Robert Crumb.

Strengths. A very pleasant session observing reality! Extremely quick and very easy sketching method, almost too effortless. I was aware of contrasting textures: stone, tin, brick, bitumen, clipped hedge. I followed the concept of fish-eye/wide-angle reasonably well. There’s an understanding here of how much to economise subject matter in order to fit it on the page. Cheap paper = useful for practising both the wide-angle concept till it feels as natural as more usual linear perspective and tonal values/texture through cross-hatching till it becomes more automatic.

Weaknesses. The uppermost perspective lines are somewhat insecure; the bottom right-hand corner needs to balance up the left.

Opportunities. Location/Light and Shade. Try doing something like facing south next time – today, I was drawing into heavy shade throughout. The natural environment. Choose a less demanding subject next time – minimise use of trees next time – there were rather too many of them today and I only included a fraction of them.Keep working on the silhouettes of trees! Tools. The paper needs to be a tad smoother, though there is no bleed-through, so it’s possible to do another complete drawing on the back. Given the small size of the page, go for an Extra Fine pen next time. In fact, work through all your fine-pointed pens to see if any of them both suit the paper and suit the size of the drawing. Once all the pens have been tested, use this concept in pencil and see how it works with colour. Texture. Cultivate a variety of surface texture next time or at least know how to render it – the shrubs are rendered in the same manner as steel building facades.

Threats. Don’t stick to pen with this concept – incorporate into pencil drawing and even colour. Watch the dark darks – they tend to draw the eye!


DS watercolour paints on Moleskine Folio Watercolour; Rosemary #2 brush; 15.75x15cm.

A second copy of Albany Wiseman’s Derelict Farmhouse in his The Artist’s Sketchbook (London, David & Charles, 2002, p.51).

Several conclusions:

  • sky: wet-on-dry today: I have to attribute the hard edges to the paper and its sizing (I’ve suspected all along that Wiseman used 300gsm for this study); mine has more granulation;
  • I’ve used DS Sap Green almost exclusively today: the background hills are ‘pure’ and everything else involves a mix with that green; the foreground would be improved with the granulation provided by DS Potters Pink;
  • I’m more certain today that he uses a cooler green than my DS Sap Green (Wiseman’s hills are much more convincing than mine as a consequence) – but I’m not obsessing over trying to replicate the exact colour so much as imitating the brushstrokes;
  • I am pleased with the transparency of washes sufficiently ‘watery’ to show pencil lines; however it’s obvious from the ‘beads’ he’s left in the foreground, they could possibly have been more ‘watery’ still;
  • there’s much more work to do with improving the visual interest of the mid-ground and I think one way of imagining that a little better would be do a pencil drawing of the entire scene, adding what I think Wiseman might have seen only to have subtracted it in his watercolour;
  • I keep seeing new things, despite having gone over the original book illustration of 10cm square – I’m today seeing blue lines as ‘window sills’ and – !@#$ – two tiny people;
  • I used a Rosemary #2 brush exclusively today and I’m more convinced than ever that a much smaller brush was used for the details.

Yesterday’s is plainly much more vibrant than today’s and it was interesting to move to more ‘watery’ washes to compensate. To give my brushstrokes a bit more ‘direction’, I’ll go for a separate pencil drawing to create imagined details in the mid-ground and try out a rougher paper. Fascinating!


DS Watercolour paint in Moleskine Folio Watercolour sketchbook, 15.75x15cm.

I’m carefully adopting a traditional studio approach to watercolour before going outdoors. That involves deciding on tube paint, the texture of the washes, the order of work, which colours were mixed on the palette and which mixed on paper and being very strict about assessing drying times.

I’m going through all my books for simple watercolour sketches I can copy, more to compare brushstrokes and strengths of washes than matching them colour-for-colour.

Copying means I can get into the artist’s head seeing how they used what technique to what effect. The current subject appeals because it very plainly uses ‘watery’, ‘juicy’ and ‘pasty’ washes in combination. A variety of mark-making is evident, as is materiality: backruns and colours mixing on the paper, the “superpowers” of watercolour.

Today’s is a copy of Derelict Farmhouse, in Albany Wiseman’s The Artist’s Sketchbook (London, David & Charles, 2002, p.95).

Behind the white paper mount around my drawing are my colour notes and order of work: 1. pencil lay-in (little more than a dozen lines); 2. Sky: what looked like a juicy wash on wet paper in cerulean (and actually descends right through to foreground on the left and down the building on the right); 3. Building first layer, with water added for watery wash towards foreground; 4. Background hills: juicy wash in Sap Green and more watery wash in foreground with addition of yellow; 5. Dark highlights (Van Dyck Brown) moving to more watery for building shadow; 6. Scarlet highlight with additional more watery dashes to its left.


  • tonally darker than the original, which is a natural consequence of preferring ‘juicy’ washes over ‘watery’ ones;
  • I suspect the paper wasn’t pre-wetted at all for the sky, for example – try a ‘juicy’ wash on dry paper (and if still too strong, go for my routine ‘watery’ wash);
  • go even bigger: published it was 10x10cm, but I suspect from the smallest brushstrokes that the original was probably twice the published size, not 75% in today’s – either that change to a much smaller brush for all the brushed lines;.
  • .using ‘juicy’ washes virtually eliminated all pencil marks – try again with my more routine ‘watery’ washes.


On a personal note, I love the summer break for experimenting. Yes, there is the ‘shock of the new’ but it’s great to play before going back into the studio proper to tackle the year’s body of work.